Lack of depth of squad and missing players like Burgess and Duffy amounts to the same thing doesn't it? We miss them because there is no one to replace them adequately."Matt D" wrote:yes, but in a defensive line-up such as we field there should be cover for someone who slips a tackle like that. for me the guilty parties were anaclet and whoever else it was trying to hustle oakes, when in fact the just seemed to watch him run past with the ball."Baboo" wrote:
And having watched the goals again I have to say it was Gilly who missed the tackle on Bettsy to allow them to set up the winner.
burgess and duffy were obviously missed by us, but i agree with mally, this is more about the strength of the squad. wycombe were missing torres and doherty, who have both been extremely impressive when i've seen them play, and easter, who seems to be in real form. 3 key players, and a load of others listed, not sure how important they are to their squad.
the difference was, wycombe bossed most of the game with all of them missing. the players they had to bring in were better than the options we had.
The conclusion that WW squad is therefore better quality in depth is probably true and understandable given the respective pyramid positions and difference in wage cap calculations.
Agree also about missed tackles. The main point of 3 centre backs v 2 centre backs is to provide cover.