Page 1 of 1
442 v 433
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 2:14 am
by recordmeister
Interesting comment on 442 v 433 from MM in the 1st min or so of his interview here...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 334680.stm
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:14 am
by Stuart Massey
In my humble opinion CW should refrain from playing 433 as he started it against Aldershot. Midson is can finish (as we have recently discovered) but he offers nothing wide. Beano was a revelation however cutting in from the right late in the game. As Mick suggests 433 when you don't have the ball is like playing with 10.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:43 pm
by Baboo
"Stuart Massey" wrote:I As Mick suggests 433 when you don't have the ball is like playing with 10.
Why 10, why not 9?
Couldn't 433 quickly be turned into 451 when you don't have the ball, or is that asking too much of the wide 2 of the front 3?