Page 1 of 2
'A Historic Speech' vs 'An Historic Speech'
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:02 pm
by SteMerritt
Sorry, completely random for a normal football forum, but this is Rage Online!
On the racist section of TiU there is a thread called "A Historic Speech". As there are some forum members on here very well versed in gramatical correctness, could someone point me out the correct version of the 2 options "A Historic Speech" and "An Historic Speech" please. Both are generally used, but which is correct? I would tend to use the second, which is why I queried it, but I have never claimed my English skills to be of a particularly high standard.
Cheers.
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:04 pm
by A-Ro
"An 'istoric" for me.
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:05 pm
by Werthers Original
It's 'A Historic Speech'. You wouldn't say 'An horse' (well some of the TIU crowd probably would).
They've got a special racist section now??
Re:
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:12 pm
by A-Ro
"Werthers Original" wrote:It's 'A Historic Speech'. You wouldn't say 'An horse' (well some of the TIU crowd probably would).
They've got a special racist section now??
But you do book an 'otel.
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:19 pm
by SteMerritt
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:20 pm
by chuckbert
I haven't got anything to back this up, but when I was a kid my Dad told me that with an 'H' noun, you use 'an' if it is a word with a French root (an hotel) but 'a' for others (a hostel). Don't really know what that means for 'historic', though.
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:26 pm
by SteMerritt
This suggests that both forms are correct...
http://www.betterwritingskills ... 05.html
...but it appears to be an Australian site, so what do they know!
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 2:27 pm
by Werthers Original
Upper-class people didn't use to pronounce the initial h in some words, esp French ones, but that's obsolete now - 'an historic' seems to be some kind of hypercorrect hangover. Don't know why it's persisted with just that word, you don't hear 'an 'otel' much any more from genteel folk.
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 3:23 pm
by Matt D
Re:
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:47 pm
by A-Ro
"(which is now often regarded as distinctly old-fashioned)"
That's me that is.
Anyway, what would you do if you found this while you were proof reading boris?
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:55 pm
by boris
If I found it while proof reading I'd probably leave it as it was printed. If I found it while copy editing I'd probably write it as "a historic speech" if it was a fairly informal piece, or "an historic speech" if it was a more formal work. However, I'd also check the text for consistency to decide whether the author preferred one form over the other.
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2009 10:10 pm
by Snake
I think there is a fair amount of debate in relation to
this issue, but IÔÇÖm with
the black guy.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:12 am
by Kernow Yellow
Preceding 'h' words with 'an' is just an ostentatious affectation in my opinion.
'An hotel'. Really, I ask you.
Re:
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:25 am
by A-Ro
"Kernow Yellow" wrote:Preceding 'h' words with 'an' is just an ostentatious affectation in my opinion.
'An hotel'. Really, I ask you.
Its "an 'otel"
Re:
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:45 am
by Dr Bob
"Kernow Yellow" wrote:Preceding 'h' words with 'an' is just an ostentatious affectation in my opinion.
'An hotel'. Really, I ask you.
To me, both orally and aurally "an 'otel" works better than "a hotel" and "a[y] hotel" (ie with either a short or long 'a'). It is smoother in sound and rolls off the tongue easier - and could therefore reasonably be considered the antithesis of an ostentatious affectation. Unless merely thinking of such things is ostentatious.....