The second sentence of the regs is "play official matches" for more than two clubs. So quite simply, he shouldn't have been allowed to play for Luton. It's reiterated in Article 4 as well, which talks about the 'integrity of the competition' being compromised if players play for more than two clubs."BigCrompy" wrote:The registrations were held by the requisite 'less than two teams', as two of the clubs he played for were on loan - the parent club kept the registration.
New Signing
Re:
Re:
Coo...well I never...!"SmileyMan" wrote:The second sentence of the regs is "play official matches" for more than two clubs. So quite simply, he shouldn't have been allowed to play for Luton. It's reiterated in Article 4 as well, which talks about the 'integrity of the competition' being compromised if players play for more than two clubs."BigCrompy" wrote:The registrations were held by the requisite 'less than two teams', as two of the clubs he played for were on loan - the parent club kept the registration.
What chance of petitioning FIFA to dock sufficient points from Lootown this season to keep them well out of the playoff race, just for the sheer amusement of the rest of the footballing world?
Re:
But that's not what Smiley Man said in response to an earlier post of mine."BigCrompy" wrote:The registrations were held by the requisite 'less than two teams', as two of the clubs he played for were on loan - the parent club kept the registration.
"Yes, you're wrong. Loaned = registered. "
All we need now is Brian Lee to clarify matters.