Page 4 of 5
Re:
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:43 pm
by boris
"GodalmingYellow" wrote:"Ancient Colin" wrote:This assumes old folks can remember how much they contributed!!
Surely Boris kept immaculate accounting records...
erm, ah, ahem...
Anyway, good though Snake's suggestion is, unfortunately it came too late to affect the decision, which I made and implemented shortly after my last post (since which I've been having a really great time watching Madagascar 2 at the Vue, hence my not posting earlier).
Rage Online has transferred its sponsorship of Sam Deering's home shirt to Declan Benjamin's away shirt (the reason for choosing Declan, Mooro, is because I like him). Apologies to those who don't agree with this decision but I didn't want it to drag on any longer. At least Sam got a pair of boots out of the deal. There will be no official statement or fanfare.
I hope we can let this matter rest now.
Re:
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:46 pm
by scooter
"GodalmingYellow" wrote:"Ancient Colin" wrote:This assumes old folks can remember how much they contributed!!
Surely Boris kept immaculate accounting records...
Oh no this is turning into another bean counters argument.
Re:
Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2009 10:24 pm
by Snake
"boris" wrote:There will be no official statement or fanfare.
Good to see “no comment
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:25 am
by GodalmingYellow
"scooter" wrote:"GodalmingYellow" wrote:"Ancient Colin" wrote:This assumes old folks can remember how much they contributed!!
Surely Boris kept immaculate accounting records...
Oh no this is turning into another bean counters argument.

Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 1:25 am
by GodalmingYellow
"boris" wrote:"GodalmingYellow" wrote:"Ancient Colin" wrote:This assumes old folks can remember how much they contributed!!
Surely Boris kept immaculate accounting records...
erm, ah, ahem...
Anyway, good though Snake's suggestion is, unfortunately it came too late to affect the decision, which I made and implemented shortly after my last post (since which I've been having a really great time watching Madagascar 2 at the Vue, hence my not posting earlier).
Rage Online has transferred its sponsorship of Sam Deering's home shirt to Declan Benjamin's away shirt (the reason for choosing Declan, Mooro, is because I like him). Apologies to those who don't agree with this decision but I didn't want it to drag on any longer. At least Sam got a pair of boots out of the deal. There will be no official statement or fanfare.
I hope we can let this matter rest now.
Good decision Boris.
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 7:59 am
by A-Ro
I voted with the majority and boris' action is in line with that so I'm perfectly happy.
It will be interesting to see who picks up Sam's sponsorship.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:49 am
by Mally
"A-Ro" wrote:I voted with the majority and boris' action is in line with that so I'm perfectly happy.
It will be interesting to see who picks up Sam's sponsorship.
Is there an alternative definition of "majority" in force on this site? The way I read the results 35% said YES and 55% effectively said NO (in that there is no way of knowing whether he has, or will in future, display contrition privately but all the evidence we have suggests that he has).
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 11:09 am
by A-Ro
"Mally" wrote:"A-Ro" wrote:I voted with the majority and boris' action is in line with that so I'm perfectly happy.
It will be interesting to see who picks up Sam's sponsorship.
Is there an alternative definition of "majority" in force on this site? The way I read the results 35% said YES and 55% effectively said NO (in that there is no way of knowing whether he has, or will in future, display contrition privately but all the evidence we have suggests that he has).
You're not trying to "spin" this are you?
Sam Deering has made no public apology!
Sam Deering has not demonstrated contrition!
Action had to be taken within a reasonable time frame therefore precluding any future action that may or may not happen.
Therefore the majority said yes and anyway I was referring to individual element of the poll which has the most votes.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:49 pm
by Yellow River
"A-Ro" wrote:"Mally" wrote:"A-Ro" wrote:I voted with the majority and boris' action is in line with that so I'm perfectly happy.
It will be interesting to see who picks up Sam's sponsorship.
Is there an alternative definition of "majority" in force on this site? The way I read the results 35% said YES and 55% effectively said NO (in that there is no way of knowing whether he has, or will in future, display contrition privately but all the evidence we have suggests that he has).
You're not trying to "spin" this are you?
Sam Deering has made no public apology!
Sam Deering has not demonstrated contrition!
Action had to be taken within a reasonable time frame therefore precluding any future action that may or may not happen.
Therefore the majority said yes and anyway I was referring to individual element of the poll which has the most votes.
According to the Oxford United Chairman, Sam Deering has displayed contrition and apologised in private.
http://www.oufc.co.uk/page/News/0,,1034 ... 26,00.html
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 12:50 pm
by Mally
"A-Ro" wrote:"Mally" wrote:"A-Ro" wrote:I voted with the majority and boris' action is in line with that so I'm perfectly happy.
It will be interesting to see who picks up Sam's sponsorship.
Is there an alternative definition of "majority" in force on this site? The way I read the results 35% said YES and 55% effectively said NO (in that there is no way of knowing whether he has, or will in future, display contrition privately but all the evidence we have suggests that he has).
You're not trying to "spin" this are you?
Sam Deering has made no public apology!
Sam Deering has not demonstrated contrition!
Action had to be taken within a reasonable time frame therefore precluding any future action that may or may not happen.
Therefore the majority said yes and anyway I was referring to individual element of the poll which has the most votes.
No spin on my part - I'm referring to the actual vote rather than an interpretation (or spin) applied to it. The vote specifically mentioned PRIVATE contrition - presumably because the club had told him not to make anuy public comments.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:44 pm
by GodalmingYellow
"Yellow River" wrote:"A-Ro" wrote:"Mally" wrote:
Is there an alternative definition of "majority" in force on this site? The way I read the results 35% said YES and 55% effectively said NO (in that there is no way of knowing whether he has, or will in future, display contrition privately but all the evidence we have suggests that he has).
You're not trying to "spin" this are you?
Sam Deering has made no public apology!
Sam Deering has not demonstrated contrition!
Action had to be taken within a reasonable time frame therefore precluding any future action that may or may not happen.
Therefore the majority said yes and anyway I was referring to individual element of the poll which has the most votes.
According to the Oxford United Chairman, Sam Deering has displayed contrition and apologised in private.
http://www.oufc.co.uk/page/News/0,,1034 ... 26,00.html
Exactly, there is no evidence that an apology has been made.
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 2:58 pm
by Yellow River
"GodalmingYellow" wrote:"Yellow River" wrote:"A-Ro" wrote:
You're not trying to "spin" this are you?
Sam Deering has made no public apology!
Sam Deering has not demonstrated contrition!
Action had to be taken within a reasonable time frame therefore precluding any future action that may or may not happen.
Therefore the majority said yes and anyway I was referring to individual element of the poll which has the most votes.
According to the Oxford United Chairman, Sam Deering has displayed contrition and apologised in private.
http://www.oufc.co.uk/page/News/0,,1034 ... 26,00.html
Exactly, there is no evidence that an apology has been made.
Depends whether you accept the word of OUFC's Chairman or not.
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:20 pm
by slappy
I wonder if the medics cut his boot off when he broke his leg?
Re:
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 4:44 pm
by Snake
"Yellow River" wrote:"GodalmingYellow" wrote:
Exactly, there is no evidence that an apology has been made.
Depends whether you accept the word of OUFC's Chairman or not.
Also depends on whether you think Chris Williams or the manager and or chairman has been writing the program notes for the last few years.
Personally, it would have been nice to have seen something directly attributable to the player in the official release in quotes. e.g. Sam Deering said “I’ve been a complete prick
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2009 5:24 pm
by scooter
Dissapointing that the decision had to be made, but I think you've made the right one Boris.