Page 2 of 14

Re:

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm
by boris
&quotMooro&quot wrote:I can understand the two keepers being listed
What? Where'd you hear this? It's certainly not been mentioned by Radio Ox or on any other forum.

Re:

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 4:24 pm
by Pe├▒a Oxford United
&quotneilw&quot wrote:D'you remember the good old days when being a supporter meant turning up regularly to a home game, with scarf and club colours?

These days we are expected to know, and want to know, the size of the squad, the salary bill and the length of all individual contracts. Not only that, we want it all real time.
Yeah, and what's more why do people want to know who the other side's players are? &quotTheir number seven&quot, &quottheir left back&quot, that's as much as you need.

Re:

Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 5:52 pm
by Mooro
&quotboris&quot wrote:
&quotMooro&quot wrote:I can understand the two keepers being listed
What? Where'd you hear this? It's certainly not been mentioned by Radio Ox or on any other forum.
Sorry Boris, tense issue...I think I actually meant &quotI could understand it if the two keepers had been listed&quot, although then again I had also assumed that at least one had been, particularly given that Tardif's name had been told in January that he could move if he could find somewhere.

Re:

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 7:38 am
by A-Ro
&quotAncient Colin&quot wrote:
&quotdr ceri&quot wrote:What's with all this 'leaving us a bit short on keepers' or 'no left sided players' stuff?

It's not the squad for next year, it's the carcass of what's left after contract D-day! I think we can assume a bit of activity to fill the gaps (hopefully with younger, fitter, cheaper models...)
Yeah, but Jim is still in charge. Do you think he knows left from right or can communicate our needs to his drinking buddy scouts?
Harsh, very harsh. Possibly accurate but still harsh.

Re:

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 8:42 am
by Resurrection Ox
&quotA-Ro&quot wrote:
&quotAncient Colin&quot wrote:
&quotdr ceri&quot wrote:What's with all this 'leaving us a bit short on keepers' or 'no left sided players' stuff?

It's not the squad for next year, it's the carcass of what's left after contract D-day! I think we can assume a bit of activity to fill the gaps (hopefully with younger, fitter, cheaper models...)
Yeah, but Jim is still in charge. Do you think he knows left from right or can communicate our needs to his drinking buddy scouts?
Harsh, very harsh. Possibly accurate but still harsh.
I'd say worse than that. Nasty. Not up to your usual standard AC.

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 9:04 am
by Mally
I've updated the list at the start of this thread with the latest information. I will try and keep this up to date as and when things change.

Re:

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 10:05 am
by Ancient Colin
&quotResurrection Ox&quot wrote:
I'd say worse than that. Nasty. Not up to your usual standard AC.
Possibly. Am still really upset about last Tuesday and maybe I am lashing out. However, someone has to be held responsible for transfer and tactical decisions and blunders and I'm not sure this is the time to be shrugging our shoulders and &quotmoving on&quot without due consideration.

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:54 am
by GodalmingYellow
I see Matt Day's 1 year extention has now been confirmed.

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:58 am
by boris
And I reckon you can alter FozM and Santos to read 'Loan expired', or similar.

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 12:03 pm
by Hog
Santos is on Brighton's released list today so he's available ...

Re:

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 12:19 pm
by GodalmingYellow
&quotHog&quot wrote:Santos is on Brighton's released list today so he's available ...
Oh joy

Re:

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 4:29 pm
by Mally
&quotboris&quot wrote:And I reckon you can alter FozM and Santos to read 'Loan expired', or similar.
Done

Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 9:57 pm
by Snake
Many thanks for keeping this up to date, Mally.

One thing we’ve missed over the years is a definitive one-click guide to the current state of players contracts, so I’ve put it on my favourites.

Posted: Tue May 22, 2007 10:10 pm
by boris
Needs to be updated to reflect Willmott signing a new 2-year contract, Mally.

(and where's that York prog?)

Re:

Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 9:32 am
by Mally
&quotboris&quot wrote:Needs to be updated to reflect Willmott signing a new 2-year contract, Mally.

(and where's that York prog?)
Done.

(and on its way to you later this morning)