Page 2 of 2

Re:

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 10:53 am
by GodalmingYellow
&quotMooro&quot wrote:
&quotBaboo&quot wrote:Not trying to condone any of this but if York fans had not turned up with trouble in mind nothing would have happened.
or indeed, had the &quotOxford lads&quot not &quotrun down to meet them&quot!
My understanding is that this is not what happened. Again this is third hand information, but I understood that those who aligned themselves to York City &quotstormed&quot the Priory and the Oxford &quotfans&quot defended themselves.

I don't do tinted spectacles when it comes to violent behaviour, so I don't doubt that both sides were jointly and severally at fault. But as Baboo said, one has to doubt if there would have been violence had the York &quotfans&quot not had intent.

Re:

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 12:34 pm
by Hog
In my view, the Cambridge switch is purely down to officers not wanting to work on the Saturday. Because of the size of our support, rather than a handful of officers' weekends being affected, it becomes more than a hundred having their weekends affected.
[/quote]

That's a good'un GY! Whatever the reasons it certainly wouldn't have been because a Saturday game would have upset the week-end arrangements of a handful of bizzies!

Re:

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:19 pm
by Mally
&quotGodalmingYellow&quot wrote:
&quotMooro&quot wrote:
&quotBaboo&quot wrote:Not trying to condone any of this but if York fans had not turned up with trouble in mind nothing would have happened.
or indeed, had the &quotOxford lads&quot not &quotrun down to meet them&quot!
My understanding is that this is not what happened. Again this is third hand information, but I understood that those who aligned themselves to York City &quotstormed&quot the Priory and the Oxford &quotfans&quot defended themselves.

I don't do tinted spectacles when it comes to violent behaviour, so I don't doubt that both sides were jointly and severally at fault. But as Baboo said, one has to doubt if there would have been violence had the York &quotfans&quot not had intent.
I think you're talking about a different incident GY. The one reported in the OM that I referred to was outside The Blackbird in Blackbird Leys and no where near The Priory.

Re:

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:50 pm
by GodalmingYellow
&quotMally&quot wrote:
&quotGodalmingYellow&quot wrote:
&quotMooro&quot wrote: or indeed, had the &quotOxford lads&quot not &quotrun down to meet them&quot!
My understanding is that this is not what happened. Again this is third hand information, but I understood that those who aligned themselves to York City &quotstormed&quot the Priory and the Oxford &quotfans&quot defended themselves.

I don't do tinted spectacles when it comes to violent behaviour, so I don't doubt that both sides were jointly and severally at fault. But as Baboo said, one has to doubt if there would have been violence had the York &quotfans&quot not had intent.
I think you're talking about a different incident GY. The one reported in the OM that I referred to was outside The Blackbird in Blackbird Leys and no where near The Priory.
Ah! that might explain a lot!! :oops:

Re:

Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:50 pm
by GodalmingYellow
&quotHog&quot wrote:
In my view, the Cambridge switch is purely down to officers not wanting to work on the Saturday. Because of the size of our support, rather than a handful of officers' weekends being affected, it becomes more than a hundred having their weekends affected.
That's a good'un GY! Whatever the reasons it certainly wouldn't have been because a Saturday game would have upset the week-end arrangements of a handful of bizzies!
I thought you might like it :D