Re:
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 6:08 pm
Though Yanek is now out of a job..."boris" wrote:It wasn't Yanek who went to get the leg splint, it was Lindsey, while Yanek treated Clarke.
Page 2 of 2
Re:
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:05 pm
Odd that it was only a trial, as that was not mentioned when he first took over."OUFC_Gav" wrote:Though Yanek is now out of a job..."boris" wrote:It wasn't Yanek who went to get the leg splint, it was Lindsey, while Yanek treated Clarke.
http://www.oufc.co.uk/page/News/0,,1034 ... 44,00.html
Re:
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:38 pm
Not really - almost all jobs involve a probationary period during which the employer can get rid of the employee if they don't come up to requirements. I suspect that's what happened here. He did seem lost sometimes as far as the match day part of the job was concerned."Snake" wrote:Odd that it was only a trial, as that was not mentioned when he first took over."OUFC_Gav" wrote:Though Yanek is now out of a job..."boris" wrote:It wasn't Yanek who went to get the leg splint, it was Lindsey, while Yanek treated Clarke.
http://www.oufc.co.uk/page/News/0,,1034 ... 44,00.html
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 8:35 pm
Good point.
Does anyone know how many different full-time professional players have made a 1st team appearance for Oxford United since the start of last season?
I’m only asking because it seems like quite a lot to me.
Does anyone know how many different full-time professional players have made a 1st team appearance for Oxford United since the start of last season?
I’m only asking because it seems like quite a lot to me.
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:15 pm
I'm sure there must be a web site around with that information readily available. (ahem.
Re:
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 11:43 am
Especially as, although well qualified, he had no experience of physiotherapy at a football club or similar environment (as shown by his 'control' of the Clarke situation)."Mally" wrote:Not really - almost all jobs involve a probationary period during which the employer can get rid of the employee if they don't come up to requirements. I suspect that's what happened here. He did seem lost sometimes as far as the match day part of the job was concerned."Snake" wrote:Odd that it was only a trial, as that was not mentioned when he first took over."OUFC_Gav" wrote: Though Yanek is now out of a job...
http://www.oufc.co.uk/page/News/0,,1034 ... 44,00.html
Re:
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 1:17 pm
Thanks."boris" wrote:I'm sure there must be a web site around with that information readily available. (ahem.
I make that 55 different players who have made a 1st team appearance in the last 14 months (not including friendly games or any of the trialists used and discarded).
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:28 pm
I believe that when Aston Villa last won the league they only used fourteen players all season.
Re:
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 5:40 pm
I didn't realise they had been in the Blue Square Premier."Peña Oxford United" wrote:I believe that when Aston Villa last won the league they only used fourteen players all season.
Re:
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 5:44 pm
Were the rest of the sqaud away at the Boer War?"Peña Oxford United" wrote:I believe that when Aston Villa last won the league they only used fourteen players all season.