So what's going on at Plymouth?

Anything yellow and blue
Post Reply
slappy
Grumpy old git
Posts: 2893
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:52 pm

So what's going on at Plymouth?

Post by slappy »


http&#58//www&#46bbc&#46co&#46uk/news/u ... n-15354187
Plymouth City Council will pay £1.6m for Home Park and rent it back to the club for £135,000 a year.

The council deal means Argyle would have an option to buy back the ground every five years for a sum equal to 12 times the then annual rent.

The rent would rise by 150% if the club reached the Championship and 300% if it reached the Premier League.

The deal also removes covenants preventing non-football development around the ground.


Council leader Vivien Pengelly called it a &quothard-headed commercial deal&quot.

-------------------------------------------------------------
So who owns the area around the ground, suddenly without covenants?

[edit] Plymouth, not Pompey [/edit]
:oops:
Last edited by slappy on Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
Peterorange
Puberty
Posts: 206
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:34 am

Post by Peterorange »

Pompey?! :wink:

You had me interested up until I clicked on the title...always had a soft spot for Portsmouth as my mum lived there.
Kernow Yellow
Grumpy old git
Posts: 3076
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 5:16 pm

Post by Kernow Yellow »

Dunno what it all means, but they seem quite pleased about it round these parts.

I guess it's generally a good thing if football grounds are owned by their local authority rather than speculative businessmen. But if Home Park, with its city centre(ish) location and 18,000 capacity, with 4 sides in place and two filled-in corners, is worth £1.6m, why did Merry et al ever agree a price tag of 7.5 times that for the Kasstad?
Steppers
Brat
Posts: 145
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:21 pm

Post by Steppers »

I think it is possibly to help the development of the one un developed side.

They have just built/building a massive sports/swimming devlopement nearly touching one of the stands which would have made much more sense to build into the old stand instead.

Maybe they have a 2nd stage to that development which was previosuly blocked/prevented from a joint development.

Having said that there attendances have fell off a cliff so they dont need the space.

As above if the council are involved then at least it should not be to the determent of the club and I think they got a 30 year lease in the deal.

(btw my 2nd club as the wife is from Saltash and it is the inlaws team)
Post Reply