This is exactly the sort of thing I mean about focussing on the rent and Kassam. I know this thread is about the rent but the point about a good cup run and the revenue this could genrate is about reducing the clubs debts and improving its cash flow. The rent is about 12% of the club's expenses and agreed by most to be at a fair level. Forget the rent and Kassam. After all it was just about the only expense that was fixed and totally forecastable every season. Where does the other £2million go every year - that's the real question."Dr Bob" wrote:Perhaps not directly related to the most recent contributions, but......
There has been much said on Radio Oxford, and elsewhere, about the financial importance of a decent cup run. But is that so we can bring in one or two more players and have the opportunity to do things that 'take the club forward', or is it likely that any extra revenues generated will simply go into keeping up with stadium rents? Maybe I missed it, but what exactly was agreed between Thomas and Kassam about costs - and are we simply storing up further problem outgoings for future quarters if outgoings are just being deferred?
As for the deferring of expenses this is exactly what a strugling business needs when things get really tough. Of course you need a long term plan to reduce costs but keeping the ship afloat is all about cash flow as any accountant will tell you.