Search found 3008 matches
- Thu Aug 10, 2006 6:06 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Crawley Town
- Replies: 30
- Views: 16164
Re:
Because the Altrincham, Scarborough, Canvey Island, Carshalton/Leigh issues have not damaged their credibility at all have they. Welcome to non-league....and it is only a matter of time before we get caught up in something too.. Sorry? Why do you say that then? Are you telling me the club is misman...
- Thu Aug 10, 2006 4:06 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Crawley Town
- Replies: 30
- Views: 16164
Re:
What a farce. I remain amazed that the Conference Board are allowing this to continue as it completely undermines the credibility of the top tier of the non-league pyramid. Because the Altrincham, Scarborough, Canvey Island, Carshalton/Leigh issues have not damaged their credibility at all have the...
- Thu Aug 10, 2006 2:17 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: A First for Oxford?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 9621
- Thu Aug 10, 2006 12:37 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: A First for Oxford?
- Replies: 16
- Views: 9621
A First for Oxford?
Is Oxford the first former winner of the League Cup not to qualify for entry into a subsequent competition?
Oh, how the mighty.......etc!
Also wonder whether there are any other English counties apart from Oxfordshire without a league club?
Oh, how the mighty.......etc!
Also wonder whether there are any other English counties apart from Oxfordshire without a league club?
- Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:17 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Available strikers
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10223
- Tue Aug 08, 2006 11:04 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Tom Winters Released
- Replies: 16
- Views: 10379
Don't forget, we only get to see the players in games, the management see them in training every day, which is a far better basis on which to make a decision about a players' attitude. Also, In the past, giving a player a 3 month deal rather than 1year have often been an indication that there is a p...
- Sat Aug 05, 2006 9:23 am
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Available strikers
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10223
Re:
Bound to happen.[/quote]"Baboo" wrote:£5 first to score !!
Don't we have to wait for the Eastleigh game for that ?
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:41 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Available strikers
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10223
- Fri Aug 04, 2006 12:33 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Duffy.....
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5427
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:09 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Out of Administration at last
- Replies: 0
- Views: 3095
Out of Administration at last
Can I be the first to congratulate the club on finally coming out of administration (as per report on club site).
The new lad Clapham sounds good too
The new lad Clapham sounds good too
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 7:08 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Big hole in squad
- Replies: 46
- Views: 21043
- Thu Aug 03, 2006 6:55 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Duffy.....
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5427
I think structured reserve league football may become a thing of the past in the fairly near future, as more clubs are looking to arrange ad hoc friendlies against local sides when it suits both parties, rather than having to head off to the deep blue yonder during busy first team periods because th...
- Wed Aug 02, 2006 6:05 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Duffy.....
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5427
I cannot comment on Duffy himself, but a lot depends on where we are with the Wage Cap - a detail that noone seems to be able to establish it seems. If we are right up against the limit, then is Duffy a good use of our last few pennies? If we had just enough to convince an experienced striker to dro...
- Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:43 pm
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: Big hole in squad
- Replies: 46
- Views: 21043
Looking at that list, I'm not sure we are that much worse off than before! Discounting Joey, if you could pick any four of that list as our strikeforce for this season I'm still not sure we would be full of confidence.... I suppose pre-illness Brooks, an interested Mooney, a not injured Steele and a...
- Sat Jul 29, 2006 9:40 am
- Forum: Raging On
- Topic: DREAMERS LEAGUE 2006/07 - ENTER NOW *THIS IS NOT SPAM*
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4011