Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:43 pm
At least we don't get 'irrational' tie breaks this way. Just hope it isn't a 5-0.
What's irrational about crowd number? Well except if one said "tie breaker - get the crowd exactly or I keep the boot". I think Bootmeister Boogie needs a ruling here."DLT" wrote:
At least we don't get 'irrational' tie breaks this way. Just hope it isn't a 5-0.
I certainly don't think DLT should be allowed to win by default if no-one gets the score right. Maybe he (DLT) could come up with one of his usual irrational judgements as to who was closest? He often does that when there is a perfectly good tie-breaker anyway"Ancient Colin" wrote:What's irrational about crowd number? Well except if one said "tie breaker - get the crowd exactly or I keep the boot". I think Bootmeister Boogie needs a ruling here."DLT" wrote:
At least we don't get 'irrational' tie breaks this way. Just hope it isn't a 5-0.
It has gone."Baboo" wrote:Oxford win 3-1
or if that has gone I can't be arsed.
Don't worry Boogie, I won't win for another two years. But when I do I am tempted to do the same again, seeing as how popular it has proved."Boogie" wrote:Well done Hog. Now do something sensible with it.