Patrick Hoban
-
- Puberty
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:15 pm
- Location: Rochdale
Patrick Hoban
I think the signing of Patrick Hoban is to date the most significant indicator of the positive direction in which the club is moving. This is a player who was being touted by a couple of SPL clubs and by all accounts is a major coup for a League 2 side. It sounds like we have been tracking him for a couple of months as the Irish season was coming to an end. We have courted him and shown an interest and it has paid off. A good scouting network will stand us in good stead. I think both Hoban and Chey Dunkley are exciting young prospects who are joining a squad that is really starting to take shape and as MApp has said with genuine competition for places. I for one am excited for the future...
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:36 pm
Re: Patrick Hoban
I agree - a very exciting signing. When Hoskins returns, we've got some serious competition upfront. I think Tyrone could be on his way.
Re: Patrick Hoban
I agree
I think the most positive thing about Appleton is that he learns from his mistakes and its afraid/too proud to change his plans etc.
The early season loans were obviously panic stop gaps as he walked through the door knowing that he had little/no scout reports for perm signings. As said above we seem to be signing the right sort of player now, not all will work but better to sign on the way up than down.
I think the most positive thing about Appleton is that he learns from his mistakes and its afraid/too proud to change his plans etc.
The early season loans were obviously panic stop gaps as he walked through the door knowing that he had little/no scout reports for perm signings. As said above we seem to be signing the right sort of player now, not all will work but better to sign on the way up than down.
-
- Puberty
- Posts: 476
- Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:15 pm
- Location: Rochdale
Re: Patrick Hoban
FFS - Injured his ankle ligaments in training could be sidelined until February...
Re: Patrick Hoban
Hopefully Will Hoskins will be fit for January.
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:59 pm
- Location: Beset by fools and ne'er do wells.
Re: Patrick Hoban
Tyrone Barnett is now looking like a proper striker, just as we decide to let him go back, D'oh.
Re: Patrick Hoban
We haven't decided to let him go back. 93 days is the longest loan available to us. We can go back in for him on loan, or permanent, when the transfer window reopens on 3/1/2015
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:22 am
Re: Patrick Hoban
I think the club pretty much did decide to let him go back as we could gave extended the loan before the loan deadline a couple of weeks ago, but instead we signed Burns and Campbell.SWA wrote:We haven't decided to let him go back. 93 days is the longest loan available to us. We can go back in for him on loan, or permanent, when the transfer window reopens on 3/1/2015
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 5:16 pm
Re: Patrick Hoban
Also, if all parties were really keen on the move, couldn't Posh cancel his contract and we then sign him as a free agent? Or are there rules preventing that? Presumably it would be impossible if Posh wanted a fee for him anyway.
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:17 pm
Re: Patrick Hoban
No, we could not have extended his loan. We had already taken him for the maximum 93 days - nothing to do with the loan deadline.joepoolman wrote:I think the club pretty much did decide to let him go back as we could gave extended the loan before the loan deadline a couple of weeks ago, but instead we signed Burns and Campbell.SWA wrote:We haven't decided to let him go back. 93 days is the longest loan available to us. We can go back in for him on loan, or permanent, when the transfer window reopens on 3/1/2015
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:17 pm
Re: Patrick Hoban
Yep, there are rules preventing that - to close the loophole you've identified!Kernow Yellow wrote:Also, if all parties were really keen on the move, couldn't Posh cancel his contract and we then sign him as a free agent? Or are there rules preventing that? Presumably it would be impossible if Posh wanted a fee for him anyway.
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:22 am
Re: Patrick Hoban
On RadOx on Saturday they said OUFC could've cancelled the loan and then resigned Barnett before the deadline.Myles Francis wrote:No, we could not have extended his loan. We had already taken him for the maximum 93 days - nothing to do with the loan deadline.
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:17 pm
Re: Patrick Hoban
That is, quite simply, wrong. Under the "emergency loan" rules, a player can't be on loan to a club for more than 93 days, whether that be in one continuous period or aggregated over a number of shorter loan periods.joepoolman wrote:On RadOx on Saturday they said OUFC could've cancelled the loan and then resigned Barnett before the deadline.Myles Francis wrote:No, we could not have extended his loan. We had already taken him for the maximum 93 days - nothing to do with the loan deadline.
Also, he couldn't be signed as a free agent as he wasn't one when the last transfer window closed - the same reason as why Hoban wouldn't have been able to play until January.
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 3075
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 5:16 pm
Re: Patrick Hoban
But could we have cancelled his loan every Monday and then restarted it every Friday? Ridiculous scenario I know, but RadOx did seem to be implying that we could have worked around it by stopping and restarting his loan if we'd really wanted to - but that he wasn't giving us great reason to do that earlier in his loan.Myles Francis wrote:That is, quite simply, wrong. Under the "emergency loan" rules, a player can't be on loan to a club for more than 93 days, whether that be in one continuous period or aggregated over a number of shorter loan periods.joepoolman wrote:On RadOx on Saturday they said OUFC could've cancelled the loan and then resigned Barnett before the deadline.
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 927
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:17 pm
Re: Patrick Hoban
No, because emergency loans have to be a minimum of 28 days. So, I guess it's possible that we could have manufactured a few extra days by having breaks after each 28 day period, but I suspect that the League would've found this against the spirit of the rules and called foul.Kernow Yellow wrote:Myles Francis wrote: But could we have cancelled his loan every Monday and then restarted it every Friday? Ridiculous scenario I know, but RadOx did seem to be implying that we could have worked around it by stopping and restarting his loan if we'd really wanted to - but that he wasn't giving us great reason to do that earlier in his loan.