Those that sit near me will (hopefully) agree that I admit Hargreaves has had his moments (it was me who nicknamed him Robocop). But overall he is 'unproductive' and not 'disruptive' enough to compensate."Ancient Colin" wrote:Examination in Stones and Glass Houses 101
Question 1:
Critically evaluate these two sentences."DLT" wrote: My tolerance of those fans who can only see good in certain players and bad in others is declining.
Hargreaves is crap. He touches the ball so little and has no vision when he has the ball.
Louis is physically impressive.
Deering's efforts were commendable but he seems to be expected to play wide right, centre and left.