Ox win
2-1
Hargreaves
5
53
2500
Lambikkins in fluffy Boots
Re: Lambikkins in fluffy Boots
Draw"boris" wrote:It's so long since I won the Boot that I've forgotten what to do! Nah, not really. Here's something a bit difficult, in a cascade fashion with attendance as tie-breaker, as per.
Result (Tam win, Ox win, draw)
Score (OUFC first)
First OUFC goalscorer (if any)
First OUFC booking (if any)
OUFC shots on target (inc goals)
OUFC possession (%age)
Attendance (total)
1-1
Duffy
Foster
6
48
2,212
-
- Middle-Aged Spread
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 11:28 pm
- Location: Tetsworth
Re:
Not so fast, Sideshow. GY also predicted an Oxford win (and he also got the wrong score) and Yemi to score first. As neither of you got the rest of the cascade correct (shots on target = 2 % of possession = 43) then it goes to the tie-break. The actual attendance was 2,089, so you win because you were closer than GY. Take it away (and don't forget the match report)."Sideshow Rob" wrote:I claim the boot - 2-0 and Yemi first scorer
-
- Brat
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:51 pm
-
- Senile
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:22 am
Re:
You are so lucky Sideshow!"boris" wrote:Not so fast, Sideshow. GY also predicted an Oxford win (and he also got the wrong score) and Yemi to score first. As neither of you got the rest of the cascade correct (shots on target = 2 % of possession = 43) then it goes to the tie-break. The actual attendance was 2,089, so you win because you were closer than GY. Take it away (and don't forget the match report)."Sideshow Rob" wrote:I claim the boot - 2-0 and Yemi first scorer
Though I notice on the official site there is doubt as to the crowd. The match report says 2089 at the bottom of the report, but 2809 at the top of the report. If the latter were correct, and I doubt it is, then surely I would get the boot?