Wham bang thank you Stan
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 12:23 pm
- Location: Nowhere near Treviso
Wham bang thank you Stan
50p in, winner takes all
Name the first goalscorer (either side, or state none): if duplicate, earlier poster wins.
If no-one wins, TB: time of first goal (or state none), nearest wins, in event of tie, earlier poster wins.
Name the first goalscorer (either side, or state none): if duplicate, earlier poster wins.
If no-one wins, TB: time of first goal (or state none), nearest wins, in event of tie, earlier poster wins.
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Roofe
32
32
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Hylton
33
33
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Hoban
81
81
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:36 pm
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
How very straightforward, not sure I like it.
Windass
42
Windass
42
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Crook 10
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 12:23 pm
- Location: Nowhere near Treviso
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Kee 27
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 10:05 am
- Location: Blakeney, Gloucs
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Mullins
70
70
-
- Mid-life Crisis
- Posts: 834
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:22 am
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
None
35
35
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 12:23 pm
- Location: Nowhere near Treviso
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
So this implies a goal won't be scored in the 35th minute?!joepoolman wrote:None
35
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Sercombe
50
50
-
- Middle-Aged Spread
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 11:28 pm
- Location: Tetsworth
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Roofe
21
21
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 12:23 pm
- Location: Nowhere near Treviso
Re: Wham bang thank you Stan
Well, no-one picked Callum as the first scorer but Sideshow was spot on with the time of the first goal so it's over to him!