The Red Shoes

Predictions as they were meant to be. Or not. Whatever.
Post Reply
Boogie
Middle-Aged Spread
Posts: 1656
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:17 pm

The Red Shoes

Post by Boogie »

Cascade

1. Number of goals Will Hoskins scores.

2. Final score.

3. Half-time score.

4. Attendance ( within 500 to stay in)

5. Name a team in Div 4 who lose by 4 goals or more. "None" is a valid entry.

TB away attendance.
Old Abingdonian
Mid-life Crisis
Posts: 844
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 10:05 am
Location: Blakeney, Gloucs

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Old Abingdonian »

1. Number of goals Will Hoskins scores: one

2. Final score: 3 - 1

3. Half-time score: 2 - 0

4. Attendance 5781

5. Name a team in Div 4 who lose by 4 goals or more: None

TB away attendance: 147
Radley Rambler
Grumpy old git
Posts: 2249
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:36 pm

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Radley Rambler »

1. Number of goals Will Hoskins scores. None

2. Final score. 2-1 Oxford

3. Half-time score. 1-0 Oxford

4. Attendance ( within 500 to stay in) 5250

5. Name a team in Div 4 who lose by 4 goals or more. "None" is a valid entry. None

TB away attendance. 150
Boogie
Middle-Aged Spread
Posts: 1656
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:17 pm

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Boogie »

1. Number of goals Will Hoskins scores. 2

2. Final score. 2-0

3. Half-time score. 1-0

4. Attendance 5500

5. Name a team in Div 4 who lose by 4 goals or more. "None" is a valid entry. Dagenham & Redbridge

TB away attendance. 220
Hog
Grumpy old git
Posts: 4540
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 3:30 pm

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Hog »

1. Number of goals Will Hoskins scores. One

2. Final score. 2-0

3. Half-time score. 1-0

4. Attendance ( within 500 to stay in) 5000

5. Name a team in Div 4 who lose by 4 goals or more. "None" is a valid entry. Accrington

TB away attendance. 186
Hoglette
Mid-life Crisis
Posts: 711
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 11:11 am
Location: Hampshire

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Hoglette »

1. Number of goals Will Hoskins scores: Nil

2. Final score: 1- 1

3. Half-time score: 1 - 0

4. Attendance 4862

5. Name a team in Div 4 who lose by 4 goals or more: None

TB away attendance: 138
Mooro
Grumpy old git
Posts: 3010
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 5:32 pm
Location: Hellenic/Spartan border

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Mooro »

CAme up with these before I logged in, but will stick with them despite their proximity to hoglette's entry....

None
1-1
1-0 to Daggers
5002
Newport
Away 112
Sideshow Rob
Middle-Aged Spread
Posts: 1240
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 11:28 pm
Location: Tetsworth

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Sideshow Rob »

1. one

2. 3-0

3. 1-0

4. 5,200

5. None

TB 122
Last edited by Sideshow Rob on Sat Aug 30, 2014 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ancient Colin
Grumpy old git
Posts: 2662
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 12:23 pm
Location: Nowhere near Treviso

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Ancient Colin »

Very Kate Bush

1. None
2. 1-1
3. 1-0
4. 5,000
5. None

TB 168
Geoff
Middle-Aged Spread
Posts: 1751
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 4:11 pm

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Geoff »

1. Number of goals Will Hoskins scores. None

2. Final score. Oxford Utd 2 Dagenham & Redbridge 1

3. Half-time score. Oxford Utd 1 Dagenham & Redbridge 0

4. Attendance ( within 500 to stay in) 4,950

5. Name a team in Div 4 who lose by 4 goals or more. None

TB away attendance. 149
Boogie
Middle-Aged Spread
Posts: 1656
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:17 pm

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Boogie »

Radley Rambler on the tie break.

Hoglette just missed out being 501 out on the total attendance.

wow,wow,wow,wow,wow,unbelievable...
Radley Rambler
Grumpy old git
Posts: 2249
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 4:36 pm

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Radley Rambler »

Boogie

I'm an honest sort and I think that Hoglette was within 500 of the attendance at a guess of 4862 v actual of 4391?

Steward's enquiry needed?
Boogie
Middle-Aged Spread
Posts: 1656
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:17 pm

Re: The Red Shoes

Post by Boogie »

Ooops I read the total attendance last night as 4361 not 4391 but having checked the OUFC website it is 4391, so Hoglette has it.

Thanks RR for the correction.

Turns out it was unbelievable...
Post Reply