I like Willmott a lot but........ is offering a two year deal to a player who has been out for 6 months with a serious injury, especially considering he is no youngster, a good idea?"boris" wrote:Needs to be updated to reflect Willmott signing a new 2-year contract, Mally.
(and where's that York prog?)
Squad Status
Re:
Re:
Longer contracts are double edged swords. If the player is injured frequently or not performing then you have to pay to off load them but on the other hand a player on a two year contract who performs well and is a regular in the team is far more settled at the sharp end of the season and will bring in a transfer fee if he wants to move early."DLT" wrote:I like Willmott a lot but........ is offering a two year deal to a player who has been out for 6 months with a serious injury, especially considering he is no youngster, a good idea?"boris" wrote:Needs to be updated to reflect Willmott signing a new 2-year contract, Mally.
(and where's that York prog?)
Presumably the prognosis on his injury and treatment was taken into account when negotiating the contract.
-
- Senile
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:22 am
Re:
I think you're being a bit harsh there DLT. He's only 30 and was one of the best players prior to his injury. Assuming he has regained fitness, I think this is good news and the 2 most important of the 4 offered contracts have been taken already."DLT" wrote:I like Willmott a lot but........ is offering a two year deal to a player who has been out for 6 months with a serious injury, especially considering he is no youngster, a good idea?"boris" wrote:Needs to be updated to reflect Willmott signing a new 2-year contract, Mally.
(and where's that York prog?)
Re:
Two??"GodalmingYellow" wrote:I think you're being a bit harsh there DLT. He's only 30 and was one of the best players prior to his injury. Assuming he has regained fitness, I think this is good news and the 2 most important of the 4 offered contracts have been taken already."DLT" wrote:I like Willmott a lot but........ is offering a two year deal to a player who has been out for 6 months with a serious injury, especially considering he is no youngster, a good idea?"boris" wrote:Needs to be updated to reflect Willmott signing a new 2-year contract, Mally.
(and where's that York prog?)
-
- Sperm
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 8:49 pm
-
- Senile
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:22 am
Re:
You're not wrong!"hit it eddy!" wrote:Yemi I assume he means (sorry if I'm wrong).
-
- Senile
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:22 am
Re:
It is."Jimski" wrote:It's 3 of 6 so far, isn't it? Day, Odubabe, Willmott. Still waiting on Quinn, Foster(L) and Corcoran.
I did say the 2 most important, and I was referring to contracts being renewed, rather than new deals to previous loanees, although I got that wrong as well!
Re:
The fact he is 30 reinforces my argument for me GY."GodalmingYellow" wrote:I think you're being a bit harsh there DLT. He's only 30 and was one of the best players prior to his injury. Assuming he has regained fitness, I think this is good news and the 2 most important of the 4 offered contracts have been taken already."DLT" wrote:I like Willmott a lot but........ is offering a two year deal to a player who has been out for 6 months with a serious injury, especially considering he is no youngster, a good idea?"boris" wrote:Needs to be updated to reflect Willmott signing a new 2-year contract, Mally.
(and where's that York prog?)
He isn't back in training yet is he? He was never quick, players with cruciate injuries often seem to lose pace when they return.
I would have preferred a one deal with the same type of clause as Day, Mansell and Bradbury.
Re:
[quote="DLT
I like Willmott a lot but........ is offering a two year deal to a player who has been out for 6 months with a serious injury, especially considering he is no youngster, a good idea?[/quote]
I'm with DLT on this one. Wilmott has been out a long time.
Do people really expect he's had a proper independent medical assessment. After all we've even been know to carelessly sign players we've never seen play.
I like Willmott a lot but........ is offering a two year deal to a player who has been out for 6 months with a serious injury, especially considering he is no youngster, a good idea?[/quote]
I'm with DLT on this one. Wilmott has been out a long time.
Do people really expect he's had a proper independent medical assessment. After all we've even been know to carelessly sign players we've never seen play.
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:59 pm
- Location: Beset by fools and ne'er do wells.
Re:
I'm probably the only one who thinks this but I quite liked Grebis and I don't think he was given a proper chance. Once the news got out about Jim not actually watching him I felt he was dumped with undue haste."Baboo" wrote:After all we've even been know to carelessly sign players we've never seen play.
-
- Grumpy old git
- Posts: 2594
- Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:59 pm
- Location: Beset by fools and ne'er do wells.
Re:
Quinn has signed a new 1 year deal, quoting "unfinished business""Jimski" wrote:It's 3 of 6 so far, isn't it? Day, Odubabe, Willmott. Still waiting on Quinn, Foster(L) and Corcoran.