The World Cup [admin's warning: contains cricket]
The World Cup [admin's warning: contains cricket]
While noting that PlunketÔÇÖs bowling statistics of 1 for 13 was the worst of our five bowlers today in Bermuda in the first friendly before it all kicks off, can I ask if we are allowed to talk about Cricket on here once it all starts for real, boris?
-
- Middle-Aged Spread
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:13 am
Re: The World Cup
I'm sure there must be "specialist" websites for that sort of perversion, snake."Snake" wrote:While noting that Plunket’s bowling statistics of 1 for 13 was the worst of our five bowlers today in Bermuda in the first friendly before it all kicks off, can I ask if we are allowed to talk about Cricket on here once it all starts for real, boris?
-
- Puberty
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:45 pm
Re:
Surely 'a' good competition?"Peña Oxford United" wrote:Extras having an good competition.
Your not forced to read it.
Only caught glimpses of last night's game but when you look at a side that bats Shane Bond at number ten thenyou know England will be in trouble.
How the hell we can pick Anderson, Mahmood and Lewis in a team before
we choose Broad I haven't got a clue.
Dalrymple isn't a got enough bat, isn't a good enough bowler, so don't pick him.
Only caught glimpses of last night's game but when you look at a side that bats Shane Bond at number ten thenyou know England will be in trouble.
How the hell we can pick Anderson, Mahmood and Lewis in a team before
we choose Broad I haven't got a clue.
Dalrymple isn't a got enough bat, isn't a good enough bowler, so don't pick him.
-
- Senile
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:22 am
Re:
Broad? You're having a giraffe matey."DLT" wrote:Your not forced to read it.
Only caught glimpses of last night's game but when you look at a side that bats Shane Bond at number ten thenyou know England will be in trouble.
How the hell we can pick Anderson, Mahmood and Lewis in a team before
we choose Broad I haven't got a clue.
Dalrymple isn't a got enough bat, isn't a good enough bowler, so don't pick him.
Can't argue with you about Dalrymple though.
Anderson is one of the few bowlers we have who can swing the ball.
Re:
Unfortunately out in the windies the ball only appears to swing for about 5 overs. Having both Plunkett and Anderson in these conditions partly explains why England can take early wickets but struggle later on. The ease at which the amateur Canadian 7, 8 and 9 batted yesterday was extremely worrying."GodalmingYellow" wrote:Broad? You're having a giraffe matey."DLT" wrote:Your not forced to read it.
Only caught glimpses of last night's game but when you look at a side that bats Shane Bond at number ten thenyou know England will be in trouble.
How the hell we can pick Anderson, Mahmood and Lewis in a team before
we choose Broad I haven't got a clue.
Dalrymple isn't a got enough bat, isn't a good enough bowler, so don't pick him.
Can't argue with you about Dalrymple though.
Anderson is one of the few bowlers we have who can swing the ball.
-
- Middle-Aged Spread
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:13 am
-
- Senile
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:22 am
Re:
Don't take the minnows tag too seriously. Some of these sides, including Canada have some very good players, including Aussie Shield and English County players. Yes we should beat them, and we did, but don't expect a roll over every time."Isaac" wrote:Unfortunately out in the windies the ball only appears to swing for about 5 overs. Having both Plunkett and Anderson in these conditions partly explains why England can take early wickets but struggle later on. The ease at which the amateur Canadian 7, 8 and 9 batted yesterday was extremely worrying."GodalmingYellow" wrote:Broad? You're having a giraffe matey."DLT" wrote:Your not forced to read it.
Only caught glimpses of last night's game but when you look at a side that bats Shane Bond at number ten thenyou know England will be in trouble.
How the hell we can pick Anderson, Mahmood and Lewis in a team before
we choose Broad I haven't got a clue.
Dalrymple isn't a got enough bat, isn't a good enough bowler, so don't pick him.
Can't argue with you about Dalrymple though.
Anderson is one of the few bowlers we have who can swing the ball.
In fairness, I suspect the bowlers took it a little too easy when they realised Canada wouldn't get near the target.
More worrying is the form of some of the batting line up. We rely on our strength in batting to make up shortfalls in our bowling.
Re:
There's a real lack of even first class experience in the Canadian side. They are club players mostly, apart from the openers and one of the lower order batsman and only the opener who was first out is actually a first class cricketer right now."GodalmingYellow" wrote:
Don't take the minnows tag too seriously. Some of these sides, including Canada have some very good players, including Aussie Shield and English County players. Yes we should beat them, and we did, but don't expect a roll over every time.
In fairness, I suspect the bowlers took it a little too easy when they realised Canada wouldn't get near the target.
More worrying is the form of some of the batting line up. We rely on our strength in batting to make up shortfalls in our bowling.
I'd expect an international side to at least look like getting them out - England didn't, apart from the first few overs when the ball swung (this was true against new zealand too, 3/4 quick wickets then nothing). I don't expect them to roll over, but you don't expect them to look ridiculously comfortable either. Effectively England had 3 bowlers yesterday (Anderson, Plunkett and Panesar) and two of them were toothless after 5 overs. If they took it easy they deserve even more criticism since runrate could still make a difference.
This is not promising for the super 8's, if they make it. I reckon England could really struggle against Kenya if the top order batting fails again.
-
- Senile
- Posts: 5178
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:22 am
Re:
Famous last words, but we'll be safe against Kenya. As you say, the Super 8s is a different kettle of kippers though."Isaac" wrote:There's a real lack of even first class experience in the Canadian side. They are club players mostly, apart from the openers and one of the lower order batsman and only the opener who was first out is actually a first class cricketer right now."GodalmingYellow" wrote:
Don't take the minnows tag too seriously. Some of these sides, including Canada have some very good players, including Aussie Shield and English County players. Yes we should beat them, and we did, but don't expect a roll over every time.
In fairness, I suspect the bowlers took it a little too easy when they realised Canada wouldn't get near the target.
More worrying is the form of some of the batting line up. We rely on our strength in batting to make up shortfalls in our bowling.
I'd expect an international side to at least look like getting them out - England didn't, apart from the first few overs when the ball swung (this was true against new zealand too, 3/4 quick wickets then nothing). I don't expect them to roll over, but you don't expect them to look ridiculously comfortable either. Effectively England had 3 bowlers yesterday (Anderson, Plunkett and Panesar) and two of them were toothless after 5 overs. If they took it easy they deserve even more criticism since runrate could still make a difference.
This is not promising for the super 8's, if they make it. I reckon England could really struggle against Kenya if the top order batting fails again.
-
- Puberty
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:45 pm
Re:
We will struggle to beat Kenya. We may not even qualify even if we beat them!. Have you thought about that one? Still cheer up."GodalmingYellow" wrote:Famous last words, but we'll be safe against Kenya. As you say, the Super 8s is a different kettle of kippers though."Isaac" wrote:There's a real lack of even first class experience in the Canadian side. They are club players mostly, apart from the openers and one of the lower order batsman and only the opener who was first out is actually a first class cricketer right now."GodalmingYellow" wrote:
Don't take the minnows tag too seriously. Some of these sides, including Canada have some very good players, including Aussie Shield and English County players. Yes we should beat them, and we did, but don't expect a roll over every time.
In fairness, I suspect the bowlers took it a little too easy when they realised Canada wouldn't get near the target.
More worrying is the form of some of the batting line up. We rely on our strength in batting to make up shortfalls in our bowling.
I'd expect an international side to at least look like getting them out - England didn't, apart from the first few overs when the ball swung (this was true against new zealand too, 3/4 quick wickets then nothing). I don't expect them to roll over, but you don't expect them to look ridiculously comfortable either. Effectively England had 3 bowlers yesterday (Anderson, Plunkett and Panesar) and two of them were toothless after 5 overs. If they took it easy they deserve even more criticism since runrate could still make a difference.
This is not promising for the super 8's, if they make it. I reckon England could really struggle against Kenya if the top order batting fails again.
With our lads there's always 'happy hour' after the game . or is that 'happy 8 hours'?