Should the ST Discount Deadline be extended?

Anything yellow and blue
Post Reply

Should the ST Discount Deadline be extended?

Yep
2
14%
Nope
7
50%
Maybe until after the Man U. match
1
7%
Dunno
3
21%
Not interested
1
7%
 
Total votes: 14

Snake
Grumpy old git
Posts: 4376
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Oxfordshire

Should the ST Discount Deadline be extended?

Post by Snake »

Now that neither Firoz or Nilu have nothing to do with this decision..
SteMerritt
Puberty
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 1:42 pm
Location: Thame by day, Bicester by night

Post by SteMerritt »

It is not like the deadline hasn't been widely published is it!
Snake
Grumpy old git
Posts: 4376
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by Snake »

What a disappointing current result on the RO poll, with us being on a roll right now.

http://www.google.com/trends?q=oxford|| ... mpdate=all

C’mon..
Matt D
Middle-Aged Spread
Posts: 1436
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 10:45 pm
Location: Stayed at the Manor.

Re:

Post by Matt D »

&quotSnake&quot wrote:What a disappointing current result on the RO poll
you mean we didn't agree with you? :P
Snake
Grumpy old git
Posts: 4376
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by Snake »

Not entirely Mr. D. It’s disappointing in that we are now down to only 11 people who vote on an issue, for a variety of reasons.

One of those reasons may be due to the fact that we’ve been electronically mucked about for the last ten years and have to move from one OUFC e-forum to another at regular intervals..
Snake
Grumpy old git
Posts: 4376
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Oxfordshire

Post by Snake »

Gosh, two more people have gone and voted on this issue.

Err, 13 is unlucky..
Myles Francis
Mid-life Crisis
Posts: 927
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 3:17 pm

Re:

Post by Myles Francis »

&quotSnake&quot wrote:Not entirely Mr. D. It’s disappointing in that we are now down to only 11 people who vote on an issue, for a variety of reasons.

One of those reasons may be due to the fact that we’ve been electronically mucked about for the last ten years and have to move from one OUFC e-forum to another at regular intervals..
I'd wager the more likely reason is that it's a bit of a non-topic and people can't be bothered to vote.
Mally
Grumpy old git
Posts: 2564
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 9:32 am
Location: Thame

Post by Mally »

I have to agree with Myles - who cares. Isn't voting &quotnot interested&quot on such a poll a bit contradictory?
Snake
Grumpy old git
Posts: 4376
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Oxfordshire

Re:

Post by Snake »

&quotMyles Francis&quot wrote:
&quotSnake&quot wrote:Not entirely Mr. D. It’s disappointing in that we are now down to only 11 people who vote on an issue, for a variety of reasons.

One of those reasons may be due to the fact that we’ve been electronically mucked about for the last ten years and have to move from one OUFC e-forum to another at regular intervals..
I'd wager the more likely reason is that it's a bit of a non-topic and people can't be bothered to vote.
Unlike the current poll on the stadium price, you mean?
GodalmingYellow
Senile
Posts: 5178
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:22 am

Re:

Post by GodalmingYellow »

&quotSnake&quot wrote:
&quotMyles Francis&quot wrote:
&quotSnake&quot wrote:Not entirely Mr. D. It’s disappointing in that we are now down to only 11 people who vote on an issue, for a variety of reasons.

One of those reasons may be due to the fact that we’ve been electronically mucked about for the last ten years and have to move from one OUFC e-forum to another at regular intervals..
I'd wager the more likely reason is that it's a bit of a non-topic and people can't be bothered to vote.
Unlike the current poll on the stadium price, you mean?
Meeeoowww! I thought you were a snake, not a cat! :lol:
Post Reply