"Peña Oxford United" wrote:You chose to make the claim, not me. If you think it stands up of its own accord then by all means let it stand: but I think "thousands of good decisions and actions" is self-evident hyperbole.
And you chose to demand excessive support for it or have it regarded as being untrue. In other words utter bollocks.
If you don't think Mick Brown has taken 100s of correct decisions and actions in all the years he has served the club and you think it is "self evident hyperbole", I think you've just destroyed your own point.
"Peña Oxford United" wrote:If the club think he's invaluable then they have the option of refusing his resignation. But the error is no less serious and damaging because the person who makes it has been around for twenty years and the principle of accountability is exactly the same.
It's up to other people to judge whether Brown is the right person for the job: but accountability demands that people acept responsiblity for error and offer to relinquish it where they have not lived up to it.
Personally I think Brown has a reputation that he doesn't merit, but it wouldn't matter if he did merit it. He should show why he bears no responsiblity for the debacle or he should offer to resign. (For all I know, he's made such an offer: but nobody's actually said so.
But if he doesn't, then what level of error would be necessary, before he does? Why the fuck is Mick Brown immune?
QED M'Lud.
Your entire argument is based on your own personal dis-regard for Mick Brown, and that is not a basis on which to carry out staff management.
Again you repeat the mistake. you have no idea who has made a mistake or indeed what that mistake was, yet you seek to crucify the man.
To repeat, the error is not serious, it is the consequences that are significant.
Again you have repeated your ill considered notion that Mick Brown is immune from criticism. I've not seen anyone suggest anything of the sort, so again we must regard this as your own personal vendetta.
This is not even close to a resigning matter, so the issue of the clbu accepting or not does not even arise.
Perhaps you mgiht like to call for the sacking of Jon Murray for the lies printed by the Oxford Mail about the club over many years. No, thought not. One rule for one...