"LoyalOx " wrote:GY: It's all about arguing is it?
OK fine. But you don't have to forensically analyse
postings all the time surely?
You appear to want
to split hairs on many issues.
This is absolutely ridiculous as usual.
Why aren't you making that comment to anyone else in the discussion, or indeed any other discussion on here? They are doing nothing different.
It isn't all about arguing per se. Do you not understand the concept of a public forum?
Someone posts something and it gets challenged if someone else believes it to be incorrect.. Then if the original poster wants to debate they respond, if they don't want to debate they don't respond. If they respond with answers which don't support their point, that is open to challenge too. It isn't forensic analysis, its just challenging a response. It is a voluntary process.
This is no different to me a making some statement that Mark challenges, I respond with inadequate answers, he will challenge me again and again and again. No different at all, so stop bringing up this only GY "forensically analyses" point. Its just a ridiculous point, and again usually the response of someone who is unable to contribute to the debate, for whatever reason.
If you don't like it, don't read it.
If you don't want to debate it, don't reply.
No one is forcing you.
It is not for you to stifle debate, or are your mates so God-like that their contributions are not challengable?
Now cease this ridiculous forensic analysis accusation that you use every time I post on here.
