Setanta Shield
Setanta Shield
http://www.thisisunited.com/news/item.asp?id=2358
So, there'll be a potential extra 5 games to fit in on top of the current list, but at least there'll be a whole extra week to do it! Oh, and a rule to ensure teams play a full strength side (by having to have a minimum number of players from the previous Saturday).
This attitude is very worrying, as they are basically consigning the already established FA Trophy to become an even lower priority for many clubs, just to get their own name on a competition. There appears to be no benefit to them in this extra tournament, that could not have remained valid by them just sponsoring the FA Trophy instead.
So, there'll be a potential extra 5 games to fit in on top of the current list, but at least there'll be a whole extra week to do it! Oh, and a rule to ensure teams play a full strength side (by having to have a minimum number of players from the previous Saturday).
This attitude is very worrying, as they are basically consigning the already established FA Trophy to become an even lower priority for many clubs, just to get their own name on a competition. There appears to be no benefit to them in this extra tournament, that could not have remained valid by them just sponsoring the FA Trophy instead.
-
- Puberty
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:45 pm
Re: Setanta Shield
Telly rules the roost Mooro. Even in the non league now. Spurious as this competition may appear I actually think that additional televising of games by Setanta will boost interest in non league. Why? Because the Bluesquare and the Football League offer something that the Prem does not have. Competitive games and uncertainty. And a certian amount of novelty as well."Mooro" wrote:http://www.thisisunited.com/news/item.asp?id=2358
So, there'll be a potential extra 5 games to fit in on top of the current list, but at least there'll be a whole extra week to do it! Oh, and a rule to ensure teams play a full strength side (by having to have a minimum number of players from the previous Saturday).
This attitude is very worrying, as they are basically consigning the already established FA Trophy to become an even lower priority for many clubs, just to get their own name on a competition. There appears to be no benefit to them in this extra tournament, that could not have remained valid by them just sponsoring the FA Trophy instead.
-
- Puberty
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:45 pm
Re:
You'll be there for that vital fourth round replay on a freezing February evening though. We'll celebrate together as Duffy notches his second goal of the season from the penalty spot to put away the spirited opponents from Lewes. I can hardly wait."Baboo" wrote:Perhaps this is a tournament that needs to be boycotted.
Re:
by the fans or by the club?"Baboo" wrote:Perhaps this is a tournament that needs to be boycotted.
The fans will almost certainly boycott it anyway, in much the same way that they boycotted the FA Trophy last season (ie only the diehards like you and me will bother to attend, at least unless we reach the final). I'm certain that we'll see a record low attendance for a competitive game at the Kas for this one (assuming we're not drawn away and lose to the likes of Barrow, or whoever).
The club will almost certainly be contractually obliged to take part, and as you've seen they've also introduced the rule whereby most of the squad has to have appeared in the previous first-team game too, so they can't be accused of not taking it seriously.
-
- Puberty
- Posts: 340
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:09 pm
Setanta bloody Shield. I hate them already.
If there had been a desire to slot in an extra comp I would have liked to have seen something a little different - like playing in a cup with lower div Scottish teams. (If allowed under UEFA rules ... there used to be the Anglo Italian so I assume it would be ok). That would really sort out the true supporters on a Tuesday night in December - Fort William away. I'd be there.
If there had been a desire to slot in an extra comp I would have liked to have seen something a little different - like playing in a cup with lower div Scottish teams. (If allowed under UEFA rules ... there used to be the Anglo Italian so I assume it would be ok). That would really sort out the true supporters on a Tuesday night in December - Fort William away. I'd be there.
-
- Middle-Aged Spread
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:13 am
Re:
And there was the Texaco Cup in the 70's which involved English and Scots teams. I think we may have played in that but can't remember for sure. Boris will know. Can't see the point of travelling all that way for some tinpot tinpottedness though."Baboo" wrote:Setanta bloody Shield. I hate them already.
If there had been a desire to slot in an extra comp I would have liked to have seen something a little different - like playing in a cup with lower div Scottish teams. (If allowed under UEFA rules ... there used to be the Anglo Italian so I assume it would be ok). That would really sort out the true supporters on a Tuesday night in December - Fort William away. I'd be there.
-
- Middle-Aged Spread
- Posts: 1436
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 10:45 pm
- Location: Stayed at the Manor.
Re:
i wouldn't."Baboo" wrote:Fort William away. I'd be there.
i'm cycling from land's end to john o'groats this summer, one of the joys of which will be seeing places i have never seen, and probably never will see again. of course, we'll also go through a number of places i do know, some of which i'm looking forward to more than others. but there's only one place i have complained bitterly about us having to not only pass through, but also stay in: fort william. what a depressing place.
-
- Middle-Aged Spread
- Posts: 1760
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:13 am
Re:
Nope. The only tinpottery we were involved in from that era was the Anglo-Italian Cup in 1972/73. We also missed out on the Watney Cup, which is obviously a great shame."Hog" wrote: And there was the Texaco Cup in the 70's which involved English and Scots teams. I think we may have played in that but can't remember for sure.